Figma is where your team designs, and its comments are great for that. But the specs, live app mocks, pages, and decks your agents produce aren't Figma files — and pasting screenshots into a canvas throws away the thing that makes them reviewable: they run.
| Capability | Figma comments | Artifakt |
|---|---|---|
| What you review | Design files made in Figma. AI-made artifacts arrive as screenshots or pasted frames — the interactivity is gone. | The artifact itself, rendered live: an interactive app mock, a spec, a page, a deck. |
| Comment anchoring | Pin comments to a canvas position on the design file. | Click the exact element or select the exact text — the comment is bound to that spot in the rendered artifact. |
| Who picks feedback up | A designer reads the comments and edits the file by hand. | Any connected agent — Claude, Codex, v0, your own — picks the round up over MCP and revises exactly that section. |
| Approval | Resolving a comment thread. There is no formal sign-off on a version. | A named sign-off bound to the exact content hash of the version approved. Authors can't self-approve if you say so. |
| Enforcement | None — approval is a social convention. | artifakt check blocks CI until the artifact is signed; publish webhooks hold a release; pending sign-offs route to Slack. |
| The record | Comment history on the file. | Who commented, what changed, which agent revised, who signed, what shipped — exportable. |
Figma comments end in a resolved thread. An Artifakt review ends in a revision your agent made, a named sign-off bound to that exact version, and a record you can export when someone asks who approved it.